On Wed, 27 Apr 1994, Jim Sewell wrote:
My contention is that a signature, while encrypted, is not encrypted to obscure the meaning. It says it is a sig, it is a sig, and contains no other information that is not readily available (email addresses can be included, but it is retrievable with a commonly available program PGP.)
A randomized signature or signature with random padding can be used as a subliminal channel... (insert creepy music here :-) -- Rolf ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Rolf Michelsen Phone: +47 73 59 87 33 SINTEF DELAB Email: rolf.michelsen@delab.sintef.no 7034 Trondheim Office: C339 Norway "On the internet nobody knows you're a dog" ----------------------------------------------------------------------