-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Some lame forger pretended Randall Farmer wrote:
On Thu, 23 Oct 1997, there's no way in nine hells that Phillip R. Zimmermann could have wrote: ...
However, I have reassessed my views of who truly has a right to control access to privacy and have come to the conclusion that privacy is too important an issue to be left in the hands of the individual, with the obvious potential for misuse.
Hmm...I haven't checked any signatures or headers yet, but something tells me that this ain't PRZ. For example, the Organization: header refers to Orwell's 1984 as a "blueprint"...forget the signatures (just got a message saying they match -- either that person's lying, "they" cracked his key, or it's some detail that has the program using a different key/ignoring some text), it is psychologically impossible for someone to go from privacy advocate to 1984-as-a-blueprint that quick.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The above is a lame forgery by some troublemaker, and only serves to underscore PRZ's new position, namely, that access to privacy should be supervised by people who have shown that they have the maturity to act responsibly, as evidenced by their success in a corporate atmosphere. I am PGP signing this post so that there can be no doubt as to its source and authenticity. Cypherpunks list subscribers should be more careful about checking signatures before believing everything they read. Randall Farmer rfarmer@hiwaay.net http://hiwaay.net/~rfarmer -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP for Personal Privacy 5.0 Charset: noconv iQA/AwUBNFAK/BpRm26Z4YsSEQIA0wCeJZ7R9w/XfDuE0HMo+eP/0ihYOykAoNef Gt1hIbRHpYtJ1jp/79hWZl0G =E9PX -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----