At 02:31 PM 4/1/01 -0500, Aimee Farr wrote:
Agree. I was just asking if there was any evidence that tech security licensing was the intent.
No, you also downplayed the perils of licensing, saying:
In the US private security consultants have numerous licenses, variable by state. ("C & G" licenses - guns, dogs, exec protect, PIs, etc.) Aren't ya'll just getting worked up over a misnomer?
I don't think that one or two posts is "getting worked up" over anything, and in any case I'll reserve final judgment until I read more.
I'm most violently against any licensing scheme of the sort, and THIS ONE IN PARTICULAR. Ya'll keep dialing the wrong damn number with me. I'm starting
Which your original message did not say.
to get miffed about it. Go beat your chest somewhere else, Declan. :)
Go take your men-are-beating-their-chests-and-I'm-a-woman-who-wants-civility comments elsewhere, Aimee. :) -Declan