There is a distinction between a 'search' and 'the method of search'. Some methods may be more physically invasive than others, but the 4th doesn't talk to the process or act, only the intent. The intent to search is ALWAYS invasive. On Fri, 15 Jun 2001, cubic-dog wrote:
eyes, ears, etcetera
On Thu, 14 Jun 2001, Jim Choate wrote:
On Thu, 14 Jun 2001, cubic-dog wrote:
This type of surveillence is allowed without warrent because it is non-invasive.
How can any sort of search be 'non-invasive'?
Amendment IV
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
-- ____________________________________________________________________ "...where annual election ends, tyranny begins;" Thomas Jefferson & Samuel Adams The Armadillo Group ,::////;::-. James Choate Austin, Tx /:'///// ``::>/|/ ravage@ssz.com www.ssz.com .', |||| `/( e\ 512-451-7087 -====~~mm-'`-```-mm --'- --------------------------------------------------------------------