17 Dec
2003
17 Dec
'03
11:17 p.m.
David Miller <dm0@avana.net> writes:
... If an art critic declines to publish something, its a loss probably only to his fellow art critics, but if a mathematician or a biologist or a physicist doesn't publish, it's a loss for more than just his colleagues.
The author has a skewed view which says that science is more important than art. Simply not true. Don't get too narrow a view of "progress".
David, you need to learn to read. "Art critic" != art, just like "lit crit" != literature. --- Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM Brighton Beach Boardwalk BBS, Forest Hills, N.Y.: +1-718-261-2013, 14.4Kbps