-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hello E. ALLEN SMITH" <EALLENSMITH@ocelot.Rutgers.EDU> and moroni@scranton.com and cypherpunks@toad.com Allen wrote:
From: IN%"moroni@scranton.com" "Moroni" 24-NOV-1995 14:52:11.13
I wish we could get off the subject of the kiddie porn , it makes me wonder what people on this list are doing when they are not ...
I believe that the thread originally was on pornography in general, not any particulary type... One reason to talk of it might be that users of legitimate pornography (non-violent erotica, X, whatever you call it) are a likely adopter of privacy technology (encryption, e cash, anon, etc). They may also be a sufficiently numerous group to affect elections, should one or the other party actually be better than the other. Particularly in Australia, where I understand X-rated material may be sold only in the Territories, and anyone living in one of the States has to drive over or mail-order. <offtopic> ...
governmental censorship. Consequently, I would like to give two counterarguments to the idea that child pornography is not something that should be cryptographically protected. ... [age of consent; generated without children] ...
One can even imagine situations with real live child pornography... Should one be forbidden from distributing pictures of oneself when one was younger? </offtopic> However, I speak from assumptions and newspaper reports, not personal experience, so all of the above may be way off :-) Adiau - Jiri - -- If you want an answer, please mail to <jirib@cs.monash.edu.au>. On sweeney, I may delete without reading! PGP 463A14D5 (but it's at home so it'll take a day or two) PGP EF0607F9 (but it's at uni so don't rely on it too much) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.2i iQCVAwUBMLamJSxV6mvvBgf5AQGuagQAhGbN/16ALjnDKKJMlPpfbctBkXt7gpZl zh+lx+w+u0jIYG6whmCwpPnSPpo1MjorHvhZ/5B/h+WonXYfSw+ZFo0ziOCtIh5S L0Jyp2LnJaU4mqggVwqMfBVlQ31Ax3sSuxxxI2YhQygrx4BauPhHMnJJnDxs7Uj0 qKFVGTK53WI= =m8px -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----