17 Dec
2003
17 Dec
'03
6:17 p.m.
Kent Crispin <kent@songbird.com> writes:
Dimitri wrote a couple of posts which dealt well with the original concept of two parties agreeing on an arbitrator/judge to settle contractual disputes (e.g. the court of Prince X) and the following usurpment of these free-will agreements by people in power who decree that _they_ are now the only valid arbitrator/judge in contractual matters.
It's pointless to reply to Dimitri -- he filters my posts. Of course I would be delighted to engage in a civilized discourse with him, but it's impossible.
Kent is lying again, as usual. --- Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM Brighton Beach Boardwalk BBS, Forest Hills, N.Y.: +1-718-261-2013, 14.4Kbps