On Thu, 29 Mar 2001, Sandy Sandfort wrote:
So in other words, there is no citation to back up these fanciful claims.
What 'fanciful' claim? - That the police have photo databases? - That on average, if they have a photo to match it'll take 'em something like three days to match it?
I'd suggest getting subscriptions to the government and LEA trade mags.
Since you seem to be implying that these trade magazines are the source of your fanciful claims, please give us a specific foundation. Making silly claims and then saying, "look it up" when challenged is intellectually dishonest, lazy or both.
What 'silly' claims? You are the one making claims (ie they are 'silly') implying you have some 'knowledge'. It is you who are lazy and dishonest. ____________________________________________________________________ If the law is based on precedence, why is the Constitution not the final precedence since it's the primary authority? The Armadillo Group ,::////;::-. James Choate Austin, Tx /:'///// ``::>/|/ ravage@ssz.com www.ssz.com .', |||| `/( e\ 512-451-7087 -====~~mm-'`-```-mm --'- --------------------------------------------------------------------