On 2003-07-23, Kerry Thompson uttered:
I felt sorry for the other 300 people on the plane who had their flight delayed for some guy with a small badge on his chest, and a big chip on his shoulder.
Sure it's nasty that the flight was delayed. But was it John's fault? Likely not -- he seems to have behaved well within his rights, morally speaking. Quite unlike the flight crew. (IOW, BA seems like the least cost avoider in this particular dispute.) Naturally there should be refunds and amends, but those should probably come from the crew's pockets. Not John's. Furthermore, the terms of contract posted earlier seem far too vague and limiting to meet the usual standards of valid contract under a naove interpretation of Common Law. (IANAL, but both good will and meeting of minds appear to fail.) If so, BA ought to be in serious trouble. In the ideal world they would lose in court, and have to either reevaluate their guidelines or state them more explicitly. In the first case, everybody would be happy, with John off the hook. In the second, they should meet with widespread public outrage, a thorough-going boycott, huge financial losses and the unavoidable backdrop to simpler terms of contract. Otherwise: bankruptcy. -- Sampo Syreeni, aka decoy - mailto:decoy@iki.fi, tel:+358-50-5756111 student/math+cs/helsinki university, http://www.iki.fi/~decoy/front openpgp: 050985C2/025E D175 ABE5 027C 9494 EEB0 E090 8BA9 0509 85C2