hi, The HAARP,project is in Alaska and they claim,that their experiments are precise and can ionise the particluar region of interest unlike russian ones which ionise in bulk and is not a hazard. I am not very sure,i follow ur mail. Regards Data. --- "Wilfred L. Guerin" <Wilfred@Cryogen.com> wrote:
[Repost Openly.]
Though my knowledge of various technologies that are sometimes called "HAARP" type weapons or technologies associated thereto due to technological similarities is vast, some recent events should be thoroughly examined and publicised in order to prevent large-scale mass-destruction issues or stimulators of global conflict.
Let us start with an examination of fact:
Pull up NOAA Weather maps for the weeks around the 1st of August, 2002.
Notice a large "Tropical storm" in the northern Gulf Coast (South-eastern USA), one that does not move for over a week.
Notice, in this storm development, that regardless of strong jetstream, altitude winds to the east/etc in significant force for cloud motion in all other regions in parallel fashion, this storm cluster did NOT move or change physical arrangement for almost a whole week.
Do you see windward trailing ripples in the satilite and weather imagry?
---
Now, granted I publicly started referencing these issues === message truncated ===
__________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? HotJobs - Search Thousands of New Jobs http://www.hotjobs.com