At 6:12 PM -0400 6/14/04, Sunder wrote:
Or it could just be agitprop meant to raise the theat level back up a notch, or provide more funding to the surveillance kitty.
On Mon, 14 Jun 2004, R. A. Hettinga wrote:
At 10:45 PM +0200 6/14/04, Thomas Shaddack wrote:
It may be also a very cheap method of "attack".
True enough.
I usually apply occam's razor to these things, but, around here, that's
cheating...
:-)
Cheers,
RAH
--
-----------------
R. A. Hettinga