On Sat, 11 Jan 1997 DataETRsch@aol.com wrote:
Hi,
You have probably read a few of my past messages about UDCM and IMDMP.
Unfortunately.
include a public key cryptosystem. However, on March 1st, 1997, new versions of UDCM and IMDMP will be released that do support the public key cryptosystem method.
I hope your not violating any patents. (Hint hint).
There are a few major mistakes in a couple of my previous delegated messages. An end-user application that supports IMDMP will not be released until March 1st, 1997.
Why are you babbling to us now then?
methods are not too comparable to PKCS methods. What I was referring to when I said IMDMP is more advanced than RSA, etc. is the actual encryption procedure itself, not the way keys are secured.
Uh, that doesn't help. You still have no proof for this claim either.
Again, irrashional claims ^^^^^^^^^^^
Oh boy.
were not intended at all. The amount of analytical research invested in IMDMP was thought to be sufficient.
One expects more from a company asking for investors to the tune of 1.5 million.
By the way, has anyone out there even tried using UDCM to encrypt a file or two?
Want to pay me to betatest?
AND-ing algorithm without trying it first. I find it extremely hard to believe that the celebrated creator(s) of Blowfish, IDEA, etc. had to go through all of this ritualistic screening complexity too. (Please do correct me if I am wrong.)
Consider ourself corrected. IDEA and Blowfish have been extensively hashed through. Flaws, most small and correctable, were revealed in that process too. (I believe one Blowfish implementation had more serious problems which were exposed by this "ritualistic screening." It's the only way to make cryptosystems secure. Deal with it or find another profession. (Or simply sell it to people who have no clue about the product).
(For the record: DataET Research's promotional agent has been fired.)
Gosh, who's left working at the company now?
Questions, queries, or comments ("gulp")? E-Mail: DataETRsch@aol.com, JKYuRamos@aol.com, or DataETResearch@geocities.com. Note: From now on, any messages to DataET Research that do not contain the text "NO FLAME" somewhere in the subject heading will be ignored completely. If a message is a indeed flame, the associated server's administrator will be contacted, and a complaint will be filed accordingly.
I don't expect you will see many messages. -- Forward complaints to : European Association of Envelope Manufactures Finger for Public Key Gutenbergstrasse 21;Postfach;CH-3001;Bern Vote Monarchist Switzerland