-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- In article <0kn1Q6CMc50e02irtU@nsb.fv.com>, Nathaniel Borenstein <nsb@nsb.fv.com> wrote:
It's fundamentally different because FV (unlike all the other systems, to my knowledge) is a "closed loop" financial instrument. [ ... FV is inherently harder to crack than systems which actually use encryption, etc. etc., NB claims ... ]
Is it just me, or does this sound like a challenge? Personally, I'd much rather see a true e-cash system (like Digicash's) succeed than some pay-by-cleartext-email non-anonymous system. Maybe Sameer will create a Hack FV page :-) Or maybe NB will offer a $1000 bug bounty to anyone who can successfully forge a transaction in FV's system (since it's so foolproof)... - --- [This message has been signed by an auto-signing service. A valid signature means only that it has been received at the address corresponding to the signature and forwarded.] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.2 Comment: Gratis auto-signing service iQBFAwUBMMytkyoZzwIn1bdtAQEY+AF/bGZOi37IlT0LTWz8zhMFM4JqZ2iSchrm Z3abBPc1MZxxDuG06NT3FCft9+eM13Fb =yXp4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----