data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/885d3/885d3e5d693e7e0d3ba433ecab55496905305151" alt=""
On Fri, Oct 10, 1997 at 11:40:46AM +0100, Adam Back wrote:
[...]
If the company has an approval system for official statements (seems reasonable, if it's a press release, important contractual decision, etc), then Alice can send a copy to the legal beagles for the ok, and they can send it on.
Isn't it the whole presumption that what Alice is sending is important company information? That is, that Alice *is* a 'legal beagle' or some such? Casual or semi-private email may or may not be allowed, depending on how paranoid or repressive the company, but that isn't the issue, as I see it. The issue is 'important company email'. [...] -- Kent Crispin "No reason to get excited", kent@songbird.com the thief he kindly spoke... PGP fingerprint: B1 8B 72 ED 55 21 5E 44 61 F4 58 0F 72 10 65 55 http://songbird.com/kent/pgp_key.html