ichudov@algebra.com (Igor Chudov @ home) writes:
I would like to start a thread to discuss the moderation and rejection policy.
I predict that Sandy won't allow any posts on the censored list that question his moderation poilicy - only the unanymous praises.
My perfectly crypto-relevant article regarding possible attacks on human relationships with the use of forged mail and anonymous remailers, has been tossed out (sorted) into cypherpunks-flames mailing list.
A dishonorable act.
You can receive a copy of my article by an email request.
Perhaps you want to start putting up rejected articles on a Web page?
The explanation that Sandy Sandfort gave me mentioned that he rejected my message because it continued a thread where Sandy noticed instances of "flaming". Note that my message was free of any flames, including its quoted part.
That's correct.
Sandy also states rather plainly that crypto-relevance is not the criterion by which he moderates this list. I question this policy.
Sandy's personal likes and dislikes of certain posters are the criterion.
I would like to hear your opinions as to whether such policies satisfy the current readership.
You won't be allowed to on this censored mailing list. --- Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM Brighton Beach Boardwalk BBS, Forest Hills, N.Y.: +1-718-261-2013, 14.4Kbps