MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE MEMORANDUM BRIEFS ADDRESSING JURISDICTIONAL ISSUES.

Wednesday 8/5/98 10:06 AM John Young http://www.jya.com/index.htm Charles Smith http://www.us.net/softwar/ I mailed envelopes to you both containing Herbert Richardson’s FOIA info about NSA attempting to sabotage Sandia/NSA projects. This is documented at http://jya.com/da/whpda.htm In John Young’s envelope I included US Attorney Mitchell’s MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE MEMORANDUM BRIEFS ADDRESSING JURISDICTIONAL ISSUES. Certificate of service August 3, 1998. Morales and I by FRAP 27 have 7 days Any party may file a response in opposition to a motion other than one for procedural order [for which see subdivision (b)] within 7 days after service of the motion, http://www.ca5.uscourts.gov/docs/frap-iop.htm#27 plus 3 because of service by mail http://www.ca5.uscourts.gov/docs/frap-iop.htm#26c to respond to Mitchell’s latest motion. Morales and I NEVER miss an opportunity to RESPOND. Mitchell CONTINUES to list NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY, Defendant - Appellee Correct heading is UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT William H. Payne ) Arthur R. Morales ) ) Appellants Plaintiffs, ) ) 98-2156 v ) 98-1257 ) Lieutenant General Kenneth A. Minihan, USAF ) Director, National Security Agency ) National Security Agency ) ) Appellees Defendants ) We will get this corrected. The government DOES NOT LIKE individuals named. Reason is that government employees like to hide behind an agency name so as to avoid 1 responsibility 2 accountability 3 liability But this is not going to happen in this matter. http://caq.com/cryptogate http://www.aci.net/kalliste/speccoll.htm Morales and I must soon implement our strategy of approaching the Senate Judiciary Committee http://www.senate.gov/committee/judiciary.html in an EFFECTIVE WAY. Approaching Hatch directly has proved ineffective in the past. http://www.jya.com/whp071598.htm Internet publication is a good way to be EFFECTIVE. http://www.jya.com/mi5-flap.htm The former agent, who was threatening to publish details of the supposed Qadaffi plot on the Internet, was arrested in a hotel room in Paris. and Now, with the advent of the Internet, it is probably only a matter of time before Mr. Shayler's allegations are disseminated. "He's a whistleblower," said Mr. Shayler's lawyer, John Wadham, the director of Liberty, a civil liberties group. Let’s hope these matter are settled soon. Then Morales and I can move for dismissal of our lawsuits. We can all be off on OTHER constructive projects. Shaping-up the US legal system is a CONSTRUCTIVE PROJECT. But it SHOULD BE the senate judiciary committee's responsibility. They need to do their job. Morales and I will get things started. I NEED to revise my book for the 80C32 with ieee 1284 ecp parallel bi-directional communications. http://www.apcatalog.com/cgi-bin/AP?ISBN=0125475705&LOCATION=US&FORM=FORM2 Later bill Monday 8/3/98 3:41 PM FAX Jan Elizabeth Mitchell Assistant U.S. Attorney U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney District of New Mexico Post Office Box 607 Albuquerque, NM 87103 505/346-7274 505/766-2868 FAX 505/346-7205 Dear Ms Mitchell: Purpose of the fax is to 1 review points covered in our 8/3/98 14:18 phone conversation 2 suggest settlement. You phoned me today. You told me that you planned to file a motion or response to the Tenth circuit’s request Morales and my response to the jurisdictional issue on the 21st of August. I told you that this was premature on your part since we had moved for a second time for an extension of time. I told you also that this matter was now before congress. You appeared to indicate to me that you were in the process of adding both Morales and Minihan as named parties in this appeal. You asked me if it would be agreeable to us if you filed a response to the Tenth circuit 21 days AFTER Morales and I filed our response to the Tenth circuit on the jurisdictional issue. I AGREED. I spoke to Morales on the phone shortly after our phone conversation. Arguing points of law before court clerks and judges who have outstanding criminal complaint affidavits for crimes COMMITTED IN WRITING againtst them would be unproductive on Morales and my part. Therefore, we will proceed to resolve the criminal conduct on the part of judges and court clerks before we proceed further in this matter. We will do this at the Congressional level. Senate Judiciary Committe chairman Orrin Hatch, unfortunately, failed to properly process a valid complaint on New Mexico district court chief judge John Conway in 1995. http://www.jya.com/whp071598.htm Hatch’s failure to properly respond in 1995, in large part, caused our current legal conflict with DIR NSA Minihan. We foresee an unfortunate escalation of hostilities if this matter proceeds as it is. We do not wish this. We seek settlement of the UNFORTUNATE matter at the earliest time. We ask your and Congressional help to settle this UNFORTUNATE matter before it gets WORSE. If I have made any essential material errors in reporting my impression of the contents of our conversation, then I would appreciate you giving your impression of possible errors. You can do this in the letter you said you would write to us. Sincerely, bill payne 13015 Calle de Sandias NE Albuquerque, NM 87111 Distribution Senate Judiciary Committee e-mail Arthur R Morales e-mail