William Geiger <whgiii@invweb.net> writes:
Adam Back <aba@dcs.ex.ac.uk> writes:
I think we'd be more interested to see an analysis piece of the political merits/demerits of the pgp5.5 CMR corporate message recovery technique than of _toilets_.
Where do you stand on the CMR argument? Or are you staying away from the hot potato :-)
Exactly who died and made you the guardian of Truth, Justice, and the Cypherpunk Way???
I just react to issues I think are important, or which seem interesting to me, same as anyone else. I happen to think this CMR issue is important. If you disagree, and think the CMR danger is over-rated, well speak up please! If you think I am a big mouth speak up too (as you have:-)
Sometimes I think you take yourself way too seriously Adam.
Well there is always a `d' key, or one of your nifty O/S2 spam filters. Also I would be interested in your personal views as a PGP compatible mail script implementor on how easy CDR is to implement (http://www.dcs.ex.ac.uk/~aba/cdr/) with your setup. Some people are objecting to the difficulty of implementing it. I think it is fairly easy. Adam -- Now officially an EAR violation... Have *you* exported RSA today? --> http://www.dcs.ex.ac.uk/~aba/rsa/ print pack"C*",split/\D+/,`echo "16iII*o\U@{$/=$z;[(pop,pop,unpack"H*",<> )]}\EsMsKsN0[lN*1lK[d2%Sa2/d0<X+d*lMLa^*lN%0]dsXx++lMlN/dsM0<J]dsJxp"|dc`