2 Nov
2000
2 Nov
'00
9:56 p.m.
At 9:16 PM -0400 10/28/2000, John Kelsey wrote:
I'll comment more on this from another note of yours. I think you're probably right, but that we need to figure out how to really nail that argument down, which means specifying exactly what's meant by ``close to an inverse,'' or whatever.
I have some ideas on this, based on the earlier note, but I think I should take some time and write them up more formally. Arnold Reinhold