Eric Murray wrote: [Stuff about WebTv/crypto/export problems]
So what's the story here? It's a web browser, so they're probably talking about SSL. SSL (both versions) already has mechanisims for allowing "export" level encryption, and although you still need to get a Commodities Jurisdiction, it's been done before so it shouldn't be too difficult. If they didn't use the "export" level SSL CipherTypes, then what're they up to? Are they fighting crypto export laws (for which they should be congratulated and supported) or are they just looking for free publicity?
I'm not sure they're doing either. When I talked to my friends at WebTv, I got the impression that they thought a functional browser needed to have support for electronic commerce. This electronic commerce needs crypto, and if you're going to do crypto right, it has to be strong crypto. Given that they've tried to do everything else right (and, in my opinion, succeeded), that may be all there is to it. I'll ask for more details next time I talk to them. Jon Leonard