17 Dec
2003
17 Dec
'03
11:17 p.m.
On 11 Jan 1998 18:48:24 -0600, Adam Back <aba@dcs.ex.ac.uk> wrote:
Wei Dai suggested that documents should be secret split in a redundant fashion so that say 2 of 5 shares are required to reconstruct the document. If the shares are distributed across different servers, this ensures that one server does not directly hold the information.
What prevents the operator of such a server from being charged with "conspiracy to provide child porn" or whatever? If he is holding a portion of such contraband, isn't he as liable as if he was holding the whole article(s)? -- Phelix