17 Dec
2003
17 Dec
'03
11:17 p.m.
On Sat, 31 May 1997, Lucky Green wrote:
If that was the extend of the story, Bell wouldn't still be in jail. The USC violations above may be the official charge, but they hardly justify keeping somebody locked up without bail. Bell is still in jail because he
The government is trying to persuade the judge that Bell is about to blow up a Federal building, or poison water supplies, or something. So far the judge has agreed and refused to consent to even bail conditions like house arrest and radio bracelet. Bell could very well stay in jail for the entirety of his trial. -Declan