James Donald (VI2) can't seem to keep his people, arguments or facts straight. He wrote:
I understood black unicorn, and Sandy, to be claiming it [routine document destruction in the ordinary course of business] was inappropriate, and quite dangerous.
Time to take that remedial reading course you've been putting off, Jim. (a) You will find zero posts from me regarding this subject. (b) You will find zero posts from Black Unicorn taking the extreme position you ascribe to him (and me). This is called a "straw man" argument. Look it up.
Black Unicorn's argument seemed to be "Everything is forbidden, therefore you need to hire a lawyer who will issue the magic incantations to make it legal.
There's that straw man again. Jim, it's easy to defeat the arguments you dishonestly put into other peoples' mouths. Dealing with what they ACTUALLY said is a tougher row to hoe, isn't it? PLEASE keep me on your "loon list." It is a badge honor tantamount to being on Nixon's "enemies list." S a n d y