-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Black Unicorn <uunet!access.digex.net!unicorn> writes:
It seems that PGP keyservers have been attacked of late for alleged copyright violations. Nice tactic if you are PKP I guess. Has anyone considered the use of anonymous remailers to run a keyserver? A double blind keyserver might solve the operator a good deal of heat.
As far as I can tell, the copyright issue exists only in David Sternlight's addled mind; and even he has conceded that he's got no factual basis for asserting that PGP might infringe someone's copyright. I can't tell if his messages about this reflect actual confusion about the difference between patent and copyright, or if he's simply stumbled across another FUD tactic to use against PGP. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.4 iQCVAgUBLQ7bV33YhjZY3fMNAQGG1QP/XbLehbgzvvdsSeN1YSKeKQGoZM0XigBt 0JClAQXHaoMeu2PDh4et7Txhq+IOvhAwrW3xCB+0aEXWiyZ3XGU0Z5rYL4e57/q6 Z5IgeYyPO/5DSIc+45XlwdC24X2MPENvex2IN2dYypGU4fUIff2GxaTW4hc4458u Agno8lsCjs4= =cjSg -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- Greg Broiles Lemon Detweiler Pledge? greg@goldenbear.com You're soaking in it.