-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Robert Hettinga writes:
Personally, I'm becoming convinced that SET is practically Ptolmaic in it's complexity. You can get money from point A to point B, but you have to go through a lot of epicycles to get there.
Agreed, SET is overengineered hogwash.
Unfortunately, I think that no MIS manager will get fired for using SET, and it'll take a serious demonstration of a security breach before people will listen to anything else. At least until someone demonstrates a transaction protocol which is, say 3 orders of magnitude cheaper...
Perhaps... OTOH, SET is SO bad that it will be impossible to deploy, probably forcing everyone away from it anyway. As far as a better protocol, it's already designed, implemented, and running quite nicely in our software. :-) Regards, Jeremey. - -- Jeremey Barrett BlueMoney Software Corp. Crypto, Ecash, Commerce Systems http://www.bluemoney.com/ PGP key fingerprint = 3B 42 1E D4 4B 17 0D 80 DC 59 6F 59 04 C3 83 64 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.2 Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.4, an Emacs/PGP interface iQCVAwUBNGoA5C/fy+vkqMxNAQGjGAQA2fnFE85Mr2QdYuZoHwhOgioTzp833POY EaOWT3z2eNhSBz8EkoVI6m/X/og6oqc5fHZnG7ys8jjVTcQX2rPiaIE26qDgisPx 2EiV7IW+Rul4hi9+dzQKfloXbKakANRtrT8CNYWGRmsstKQd4hXVsVmdrV4USRe5 b55K7Di7pqk= =IeCU -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----