On Fri, 3 Nov 1995 clarkm@cnct.kom wrote:
Thanks for this item! Two little excerpts jump out at me.
Gee, I hope they didn't spook you too badly when they jumped out at you like that. I can tell you're a little jumpy.
Hi Rich! Thx for changing my domain, I'm sure it fooled SAIC.
So what is it? 1,154 wiretaps? Or 20,000?
Easy: both. 1,154 wiretaps, and 20K to 25K intercepts, which includes both wiretaps and other interceptions, i.e., recording which phone numbers you call but not actually listening to the conversations.
Get out of Dodge.
You get out of Dodge. 1,154 electronic surveillance orders, about 7,000 pen registers & trap/trace plus 500 FISA warrants, all 1993 if memory serves. Figures as supplied to EPIC, and from memory.
By whom is the FBI being sued? What is the case number? Who are the lawyers? What are their Bar numbers? How many times have they been disciplined for bringing frivolous suits?
EPIC. Quick!! Fire up your index!
What's so special about the year 2002?
Obviously, it is two elections from now, when the UN will invade the US to impose the rule of the Anti-Christ.
Oops, I wasn't supposed to say that.
But now that you have... Check out the wiretap stats and FOIA responses at http://www.epic.org and come back & quibble some more. .---. .----------- * :::::::::::::::::::::::::::: / \ __ / ------ * clark.matthews@paranet.org / / \(..)/ ----- * :::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ////// ' \/ ` ---- * //// / // : : --- * PERMISSION TO \\/ / * / /` '--* COPY / REPOST \*/ * //..\\ x-x-UU----UUx-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x '//||\\` N E M O..M E..I M P U N E..L A C E S S I T x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x