-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Where's the "discovery" here? I posted a story from Stratfor to the list Tuesday, Sept 25. Oh well, glad you found it anyway.
Yup, by far the most intelligent analysis I've seen.
It's good, but I'm guessing the classified work from RAND is even better. It all comes down to who gets the cabinet's ear: I could be wrong, but either way it looks like the cooler heads at least have a chance this time around. Here's to hoping. ~F.
On Sat, Sep 29, 2001 at 07:50:01PM -0500, measl@mfn.org wrote:
Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 21:58:01 -0500 (CDT) From: Nathanael Dermyer <nate@zero.neohaven.net> To: free@zero.neohaven.net Subject: [FREE] stratfor
This is a website about strategic forcasting. These people really know their shit.
Read these in order ... these are their forcasts for the war we're about be thrown into
http://www.stratfor.com/home/0109242145.htm (intro - conceptual framework) http://www.stratfor.com/home/0109252150.htm (war plan - afghan theatre) http://www.stratfor.com/home/0109262355.htm (war plan - us theatre) http://www.stratfor.com/home/0109272330.htm (war plan - intercontinental theatre) http://www.stratfor.com/home/0109282120.htm (war plan - follow up)
-Nathanael
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: Hush 2.0 wl8EARECAB8FAju3fDIYHGF1dG8zMDEwOTRAaHVzaG1haWwuY29tAAoJEKadvsVlUK4P wVAAniDu4nrqbemrOqboh3wnNa+K/AAJAJ4775cunOECfF46aviHAHb4S3IoOA== =7Jl5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----