17 Dec
2003
17 Dec
'03
11:17 p.m.
Sandy Sandfort wrote:
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ SANDY SANDFORT In addition to the "exceptions," there was no penalty for violation of the law, thus making sure it was unenforceable. It was not a case of "pro-gun fascism" but of rough American political humor. At the very least it kept the city council out of more serious mischief.
Was there a bar against a person obtaining an injunction to force someone to purchase a gun or a provision providing that no liabilities would be incurred as a result of not owning one? The law is much too important to start abusing to make political points. Phill