17 Dec
2003
17 Dec
'03
11:17 p.m.
On Wed, Jun 11, 1997 at 09:37:42PM -0500, William H. Geiger III wrote: [...]
The end buyer should not be held responcible for the illegal activities of the seller.
Regardless of responsibility, if the original owner can prove it is stolen goods, the end buyer is out of luck -- clearly the original owner should get their goods back. And if the end buyer provably has clear knowledge that it is stolen property, they are an accesssory to the crime. -- Kent Crispin "No reason to get excited", kent@songbird.com the thief he kindly spoke... PGP fingerprint: B1 8B 72 ED 55 21 5E 44 61 F4 58 0F 72 10 65 55 http://songbird.com/kent/pgp_key.html