-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- On Sat, 16 Aug 1997, Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM wrote: [...]
In all fairness, in addition to Stanford Wallace, there are several other spammers sending out junk e-mail. If you completely eliminate Stanford and his company, you will STILL get junk e-mail.
Of cause this is true, but he is one of the beggest and thus gets the most attention. If we can stop him we cut down alot of email spam and we can move on the smaller one. Its like optimising code, you find where its taken most of its time and you optimise that.
Perhaps this will spark another round of a cypherpunk discussion of technical solutions to junk e-mail...
Hopefully, the spammers are just as effective censors as the goverment is IMHO.
I placed myself on a zillion "remove" lists. Now I no longer get any junk e-mail of interest (which I did on rare occasions),
I'm haveing trubble parsing this message, do you mean that you are not getting any junk e-mail that you are interested in?
but still get at least once a day an MMF
I think this is a diffrent class of posting. Thouse peaple who post MMF do it from ignorence and stupidity, while this dosn't make what thay have done any less harmfull, it means that it has to be fixxed in a diffrent way to normal UCE. - -- Please excuse my spelling as I suffer from agraphia see the url in my header. Never trust a country with more peaple then sheep. ex-net.scum and proud You Say To People "Throw Off Your Chains" And They Make New Chains For Themselves? --Terry Pratchett -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.3i Charset: noconv iQCVAwUBM/ctg6QK0ynCmdStAQGVDAQAhHkKWZs0Mxnqs0OEcZ71x8mxZaJSCaYq ZYu3UU6jH91+Qg1s+Cl2q/t+YF4RQIId0rX1irqVx+Cp80fQKYDJrTDXD3ptwa9B 2p8zDouF08yuzKvhrC9gC2JbgB4AzYmbAYyQ4KrjuPxuEEOd8omQKYFdkhHnZ6/W FfR/djktv4E= =8rv9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----