At 11:39 AM 5/24/96 -0500, Jim Choate wrote:
If there was an absolute Truth as you postulate the results would be many and varied. For instance,
1. If the Truth were absolute everyone would have to accept it as such even if they disagreed or said it wasn't the Truth,
Only if they were infallible.
2. What is the litmus test for ultimate Truth? How do you tell it from regular truth? How do you tell it from a lie? From the Lie?
The usual methods.
3. If there were a ultimate Truth then this implies that it is possible to have a system which can fully describe itself.
This is an argument against divinity, not an argument that the truth does not exist out there in the world and pretty well knowable most of the time. All your arguments are just variants of the claim "Subjectivism must be true because it must be true", which is obviously self contradictory --------------------------------------------------------------------- | We have the right to defend ourselves | http://www.jim.com/jamesd/ and our property, because of the kind | of animals that we are. True law | James A. Donald derives from this right, not from the | arbitrary power of the state. | jamesd@echeque.com