On Fri, Jan 28, 2005 at 10:16:44AM -0500, Tyler Durden wrote:
That's an interesting point. They seem to be "attacking" at precisely the correct rate to forcibly evolve P2P systems to be completely invulnerable to such efforts.
Not really. The P2P assm^H^H^H^H architects are reissuing new systems with holes patched reactively. There's no reason for a P2P system designed in 1996 to be water-tight to any threat model of 2010. (Strangely enough, they had IP nazis and lawyers back then, too).
Hum. Perhaps Tim May works for MPAA? Nah... he wasn't THAT bright, was he?
I think he was primarily one thing: frustrated. It's hard to see the idiots win, year after year. -- Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://leitl.org">leitl</a> ______________________________________________________________ ICBM: 48.07078, 11.61144 http://www.leitl.org 8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A 7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE http://moleculardevices.org http://nanomachines.net [demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type application/pgp-signature]