15 Aug
2001
15 Aug
'01
7:28 p.m.
Jimbo sputtered:
The desire to get the 'speech' is what drives the act.
Nonetheless, they are separate and separable. Outlawing the act does not require outlawing the speech.
No they are not. You can't make the picture without commiting the act.
A not-so-clever straw man. "Making" the picture is not the speech in question, Duh. Distributing the picture is. And you can distribute the picture, without committing the underlying act yourself.
If you could, it wouldn't be 'porno'...
As I said (and Jimbo ignored), porn is not illegal, per se, only obscenity. Perhaps that is a distinction without a difference, but that's the way the laws work. S a n d y