17 Dec
2003
17 Dec
'03
11:17 p.m.
| Adam Shostack writes: | [oddly, I never received the original copy of this; I seem to be missing | list messages with increasing frequency recently :( ] | > Real remailers (with return address features) should probably | > be advertised in alt.support.* and alt.recovery, in order to build a | > class of "good" users for them. [...] When I wrote this, I did not mean to claim that remailers w/o return addresses are not real. I meant to say that remailers that rely on operator screning & approval of messages are not what I consider real remailers. Adam -- "It is seldom that liberty of any kind is lost all at once." -Hume