A consequence of issuing subpoenas to news folks is to inhibit their reporting on the trial, for witnesses are excluded from the proceedings, at least before their testimony -- I'm not sure about exclusion after testimony. No doubt a rich publisher will assign a second reporter to cover the trial. Which is what superrich Cryptome will do, as well as get daily transcripts, hopefully in digital form for immediate publication -- even to be laptopped by those excluded from the trial. Unless this public announcement precludes this 1A plot. If so, then we'll go to backups 1, 2, 3 and so on. Anybody know who the second subpoenaed reporter is? Jeff answered the inquiry about my GJ transcript: "don't get your hopes up. I've never heard of that happening, instead only portions of GJ testimony are available if introduced at the trial." That's not what Robb told me before testifying, but then he's a mouther rather than a shooter like Jeff. Anybody who thinks questions posed during testimony will be limited to what was assured beforehand has got to be from Pluto. Same credulity for "off the record." The feds will tell you anything to get your cooperation. And leave to your imagination and planted news stories what will happen if you don't. Jim Bell is a poster boy for that, and I continue to believe that's his role, probably with his help, coerced or willing. This is not to say that journalists, any seducer, are so different. That's the problem with privilege and pulling rank -- they're a corrupting, contemptous divide of us-winners/you-losers. And do seducers scream when their scams are exposed. Robb wants the attention poster boy Declan can give his vendetta, the gov's intention to show who runs cyber-space and -spacers.