17 Dec
2003
17 Dec
'03
11:17 p.m.
On Thu, 25 Sep 1997 Syniker@aol.com wrote:
At this point... after what's happened so far.. I'm in favor of a Clinton veto... NO crypto laws at all...
What Congress can grant, they can take away. I'm not sure if I like the SAFE language that "grants" me the right to use whatever encryption device I like at whatever strength I like. You see... I thought that was an inalienable right that Congress can't grant, let alone take back. No pro-crypto legislation will survive a Clinton veto. I challenge those who disagree to post a contrary scenario. -Declan