17 Dec
2003
17 Dec
'03
11:17 p.m.
"dm" == David Mazieres <dm@amsterdam.lcs.mit.edu> writes: dm> How did kerberos avoid this? The "bones" distribution of kerberos dm> without crypto was not regulated by ITAR, right? In the ``bones'' version not only was the encryption code eliminated (e.g., the functionality of libdes.a), but the hooks to call such code disappeared as well. michael