-- On 11 Apr 2003 at 23:19, Tim May wrote:
This looting and collapse is a consequence of the sacking of Baghdad. Perhaps it's part of the plan. Burn off several million useless eaters and maybe there's a chance for a more compliant U.S. client state.
As Anne Coulter and her fellow republidykes have suggested, invade their country, take their oil, give their children blue eyes, convert them all to Christianity, and kill those who don't convert.
If that was the plan, the US would do Sudan, not Iraq. What happened was that when the conscript armies collapsed, Saddam threw his highly privileged non conscript police forces into battle, so naturally the US army smashed them. Poof. No police. No police in a nation of twenty million welfare bums. Result, loot and burn. The US army was not expecting this. Remember Narisaya. US army defeated the regular Iraqi army, thought Narisaya done. Proceeds on its merry way, advancing far past Narisaya. Police attack, seriously impairing US ability to supply troops at the front -- people at the front run alarmingly short of food, fuel, and water. Disaster looms. Result. US army wipes out all police everywhere in a nation of welfare bums. That was not the plan, that was an extremely violent reaction to a close brush with disaster. --digsig James A. Donald 6YeGpsZR+nOTh/cGwvITnSR3TdzclVpR0+pr3YYQdkG da5or2d54+B0YDDe+XcGf9u1Q6Ci33/LFTfqvsPL 4f3E7kWr1ciIuU7/AuIEAxqt3sNcy9/5WE+dIOkBV