22 Jul
2001
22 Jul
'01
1:15 a.m.
On Sat, Jul 21, 2001 at 01:55:12PM -0700, John Young wrote:
Why bust Dmitry and not the head of ElcomSoft if the primary crime is commercial gain? That he is claimed to be the copyright holder is thin stuff, for that does not support his being the main commercial beneficiary (unless the FBI has evidence that was not revealed about Elcomsoft's internal finances).
The problem with this analysis is that he does not have to be the main commercial beneficiary for the charges to stick. -Declan