-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- In list.cypherpunks, ravage@einstein.ssz.com writes:
Forwarded message:
Date: Sat, 04 Jan 1997 10:24:21 -0800 From: Dale Thorn
C'mon Gary, why would anyone want to bother with all of this crap? Chip implants are already in millions of pets. It's simple, cheap, and there's no work for the owner.
And there are several standards which are NOT compatible. Simply putting a chip in your pet (or child) is not sufficient to guarantee their return.
I would really like to see some statistics on the number of "lost children" who have suffered (any given incommodation) exclusively due to their inability to be positively linked with some True Idendity. Most of the English-speaking children with which I'm aquainted can answer the question "What's your name?". - -- Roy M. Silvernail [ ] roy@scytale.com DNRC Minister Plenipotentiary of All Things Confusing, Software Division PGP Public Key fingerprint = 31 86 EC B9 DB 76 A7 54 13 0B 6A 6B CC 09 18 B6 Key available from pubkey@scytale.com, which works now -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.2 iQCVAwUBMs9ZERvikii9febJAQFdSwP/Tvwvd/cKyU3AIZGnxzawB7TvtZzxix0n lfORbWDAdt6NEPSST6QJKNFhfmedk34OdaeppwXiQd3S/mqFksXzctDr3oPRlgOz uHxaHow9sGPJsraqIbXehGtbg1xBnMYrVLjEx2wnRB2yeTWr8jAWfqDrza+yGtKc CNU0n3z4zig= =3ElR -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----