On Wed, 25 Dec 1996 23:17:53 -0500, Blake Coverett wrote:
And to think MS was good enough to provide an UpdateResource API that I haven't yet had a good reason to use.
Right thoughtful of them, wasn't it..? <g>
Interestingly enough, CSP signatures are held in the registry instead of the binary, necessitating some install procedure for a given CSP. Not to start rumors, but NT 4.0 does use threads to watch some registry entries that control the version (workstation/server). Not much of a stretch to imagine a thread that tracks (reports?) changes to
Nope, a little experimentation shows you can change those entries while the system is running to your hearts contents. Try temporarily renaming the signature key of the base provider.
Now, yes. However I wonder how quickly a service pack would be released to extend the monitor garbage... # Chris Adams <adamsc@io-online.com> | http://www.io-online.com/adamsc/adamsc.htp # <cadams@acucobol.com> | send mail with subject "send PGPKEY" "That's our advantage at Microsoft; we set the standards and we can change them." --- Karen Hargrove, Microsoft (quoted in the Feb 1993 Unix Review editorial)