17 Dec
2003
17 Dec
'03
11:17 p.m.
Adam Back <aba@dcs.ex.ac.uk> wrote:
Unfortunately good quality textual steganography encodings are I think a hard problem for reasonable data rates. One advantage in our favour is the massively noisy and incoherent garbage which forms the majority of USENET traffic. Plausibly mimicing an alt.2600 or warez d00d message, or a `cascade' seems like an easier target.
yA, d00d, i g0tz yEr stEg0 dAtA eNcOded r1gh+ h3re... ;-)