-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- In list.cypherpunks, ipgsales@cyberstation.net writes:
In view of the willful violation of our confidential release, without knowing everything involved, and putting it out on the Internet, please be advised that other than those who have heretofore been evaluating the system, we will make no further releases except on a highly selective basis.
I submit that this is what one would expect when one sends supposedly confidential material out in the absence of binding NDAs. IPG, why don't you simply post the source code to your system? I know I've suggested this before, but it bears repeating that any truly secure cryptosystem depends _only_ on the secrecy of the key. The algorithm should be able to be published in the New York Times with no compromise to the security of the system. If this is not the case for your system, than perhaps you should be considering alternative entrepreneurial exploits. - -- Roy M. Silvernail -- roy@cybrspc.mn.org "I'm a family man, model citizen." -- Warren Zevon -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.2 iQCVAwUBMU+dlBvikii9febJAQFQVgP/c1N4VEpsaW7CN27HqIG4yvtsSUGOY2yK iyiVSdXX7FrL6KqGCI2Ei0IckUoBiwDWau9Qwg35ZSllnXqTcEDQ9P4jpd5kz6jS SCpsdwbEFSmn3rhR9Lgo+B1kSIlkG3hGFQMfEai6owgO+Y1IISoKFds4L8epAaCu 74uomtLh2zc= =MRGE -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----