17 Dec
2003
17 Dec
'03
3:17 p.m.
Excerpts from internet.cypherpunks: 18-Jul-96 Re: TLA abuse (?) [non-cryp.. by "Clay Olbon II"@dynetics
Child pornography is illegal, however I don't believe that pictures of nekkid children are always considered to be child pornography (however much small-minded twirps want you to believe that they are). I know several "fundamentalists" who decry what our society has sunk to with images such
The Knox case established that lascivious exhibition of the genitals (required for conviction) could take place when the kid was clothed. In that case, the girls were dancing around wearing leotards. I have my cites at work. -Declan