
17 Dec
2003
17 Dec
'03
5:17 p.m.
So we do agree after all! -Declan (Who thinks that no consensual speech should be banned by the government. I can, however, see a common law argument for spam as trespass after repeated cease-and-desist notes are sent.) On Fri, 6 Jun 1997, Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM wrote:
Declan McCullagh <declan@pathfinder.com> writes:
I suspect we agree on spam.)
I kind of doubt it.
Do you believe, as I do, that "spam" deserves the protection as any other kind of speech, and that so libel, child pornography, and bolb-making instructions?
I didn't think so. :-)
---
Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM Brighton Beach Boardwalk BBS, Forest Hills, N.Y.: +1-718-261-2013, 14.4Kbps