Eric Cordian wrote:
Roy Silvernail writes:
Regardless of the underlying intent, this is just another edit war. In this case, the Boss happens to be involved. I would be much more concerned if the history page were altered to conceal the edits.
Well of course it has. No versions of the censored article are available.
Apologies. That's what I get for coming late to a discussion.
Didn't we predict edit wars (of a sort) back in the Depew days?
I wouldn't call removal of everything added to the article an edit war. An edit war is when two sides argue over differing versions of content. This is the suppression of content.
It's the same thing, really. In this case, one side's preferred version is no version at all. That being said, I looked at the mirrored copy of the original article, and now I'm a bit confused as to the suppressors' agenda. The original appears balanced and factual. What's to be gained from hiding the details? -- Roy M. Silvernail is roy@rant-central.com, and you're not "It's just this little chromium switch, here." - TFT CRM114->procmail->/dev/null->bliss http://www.rant-central.com