-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 At 12:51 PM -0700 on 8/11/02, A.Austrian.Idiot single hops yet another remailer and wrote:
I would think you might be interested in going deeper, as "Blind signatures for untraceable payments" is directly applicable to both digital settlement and digital voting.
Yes. Of course. And, if you actually read it, or even just thought about it instead of spewing oppositional bullshit to everything you disagree with politically, :-), you'd soon realize that you can't actually control an truly anonymous voting scheme any more than you can control a truly anonymous bearer asset. Like equity, an anonymous vote is completely salable. In short, sir, please to fuck off, until you actually know what you're talking about. Cheers, RAH -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP 7.5 iQA/AwUBPVbGfsPxH8jf3ohaEQKaCACg5imhi38mKjBmPiX1uo4V2l77PiQAoK4K Md2o5nPZy57vzqZNFDuJdFcP =4bGV -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- ----------------- R. A. Hettinga <mailto: rah@ibuc.com> The Internet Bearer Underwriting Corporation <http://www.ibuc.com/> 44 Farquhar Street, Boston, MA 02131 USA "... however it may deserve respect for its usefulness and antiquity, [predicting the end of the world] has not been found agreeable to experience." -- Edward Gibbon, 'Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire'