On Saturday, September 15, 2001, at 07:28 PM, Eric Cordian wrote:
I agree with this. The Twin Towers should be built bigger than before (twice as big if it's feasible). I know some people would be scared to have office space in there, but that's fine, because people who are not scared will take space there, and everyone will know it. I would take an office on the 200th floor if I could.
Are you aware that India is going to open a 224 story 2222 foot tower for business in 2008?
It's the Center of India Tower, in Katangi, India. I believe it has a webpage somewhere.
A Schelling point target for the Pakistanis, the Sikhs, the Tamil Tigers, and the Bovine Liberation Army. (Says India, "We are not cowed by the BLA!") People can work in anthills if they want to...I'm glad I don't have to go _near_ these places. They can rebuild the Towering Infernos if they wish to, with insurance money, but the taxpayer should not pay a single dime for the Heights of Hubris to be rebuilt. Let them stand or fall, so to speak, on their own merits. I predict they'll be economic disasters if rebuilt: firms are scrambling to find the 10 million square feet of lost office space, 15 million counting nearby buildings damaged or collapsed. Those firms will likely have either left Manhattan or will have settled in to other new office buildings. Decentralization, a la NASDAQ and Napster-like trading systems will further cause a diaspora. Rebuilt towers would come on the market after all of this. Granted, this happened in 1970-74, when the two towers were opened, but developers had known about it for a decade and so it was part of the plans. And in any case, a real estate recession hit Manhattan in the mid-70s, possibly made worse by all that square footage added. Unlikely that a free market investor would choose to build 10 million square feet of space in one project. Notice that there was no evidence of plucking people off the rooftops with helicopters, no signs of aerial fire-fighting? These buildings are deathtraps. --Tim May