imho, it's a very warped kind of mind that insinuates some evil is no big deal because greater evils exist in the world.
It's a matter of perspective and a weighing of consequences. Are you trying to so that all evils are inherently equal?
it's an argument I see often among the libertarians around here. "what's the big deal about murder? govt's do it all the time. everyone should be able to murder anyone if govt's do it. why, the right to murder people is an inalienable right!!". of course the arguments are never made in this language-- the fun is spotting it in the rhetoric.
I often see arguments on this list where people happily build irrelevant straw men and pound them into a pulp. What's more amazing is that they're not doing it deliberately; they simply miss the point. You see whatever you expect to see.
This is why I look forward to this Brave New World of fully untraceable communications and fully untraceable economic transactions.
ah, an even more warped mind that not merely condones it but "looks forward to it"
careful, timmy, your slime is showing!!
Careful vladdy, your detweiler is showing. I thought the message was a pretty clear statement of opinion. ie. the deconstruction of democracy is a good thing and cryptoanarchy will a enable a more just society. (Some would argue more brutal as well, but I think that the level of brutatlity in society would change little from it's current levels.) So cut the crap and go ahead and argue for or against that thesis. (by the way. Conveniently enough Tim May has put his ideas on the web in quite a bit of detail. Just put "cyphernomicon" in your favorite web search engine) -------------------------------------------------------------- Omegaman <mailto:omega@bigeasy.com> PGP Key fingerprint = 6D 31 C3 00 77 8C D1 C2 59 0A 01 E3 AF 81 94 63 Send a message with the text "get key" in the "Subject:" field to get a copy of my public key. --------------------------------------------------------------