There have been a bunch of other cases involving the deal-cutting portion of the CDA. I believe the Drudge lawsuit complaint refers to them. If not, AOL's response to the complaint certainly will. -Declan On Thu, 2 Oct 1997, Georgia Cracker Remailer Administrator wrote:
On Thu, 2 Oct 1997, Declan McCullagh wrote:
At 13:46 -0400 10/2/97, Anonymous wrote:
Another case where the CDA protected against liability. Remailer ops should look into this.
This remailer-op, while not previously aware of the case, is well-aware of that provision of the CDA, but has not yet had the need or opportunity to use it as a legal defense. The reference is Public Law 104-104, Title V, Subtitle A, Sec. 502 as it amends (47 U.S.C. 223). The text of this law is available on-line at:
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c104:S.652.ENR:
My interpretation of this is: Anonymous remailers are internet service providers.
-- For information on this anonymous remailing system, send the subject "remailer-help" to <remailer@anon.efga.org> or visit our web pages at http://anon.efga.org/anon/. To contact the operator directly, send mail to <admin@anon.efga.org>. For general information and discussion about anonymous remailers, send a message with "subscribe" in the body to <remailer-politics-request@server1.efga.org>.