Hi William, Many thanks for the reply. I was hoping it was ok having Blowfish, but I guess it could be their own "efficient" version. Bye for now.
-----Original Message----- From: William H. Geiger III [SMTP:whgiii@invweb.net] Sent: Friday, January 23, 1998 2:12 PM To: Pearson Shane Cc: 'cypherpunks@toad.com' Subject: Re: FW: Symantec Norton, Your Eyes Only.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
In <01ISPY42BHTU00B7O0@hmgwy1.isd.tafensw.edu.au>, on 01/23/98 at 02:56 PM, Pearson Shane <Shane.Pearson@tafensw.edu.au> said:
Anyone?
-----Original Message----- From: Pearson Shane Sent: Thursday, January 15, 1998 1:25 PM To: 'cypherpunks@toad.com' Subject: Symantec Norton, Your Eyes Only.
Hey all,
Just wondering what people think of this product? Good, bad or ugly?
Is there an international version and a US version?
If so, what limitations are in the international version?
Many thanks...
Is source code available for peer review? NO
Is it US Commercial software? YES
I wouldn't use it to secure an outhouse. No source no trust.
- -- - --------------------------------------------------------------- William H. Geiger III http://users.invweb.net/~whgiii Geiger Consulting Cooking With Warp 4.0
Author of E-Secure - PGP Front End for MR/2 Ice PGP & MR/2 the only way for secure e-mail. OS/2 PGP 2.6.3a at: http://users.invweb.net/~whgiii/pgpmr2.html
- ---------------------------------------------------------------
Tag-O-Matic: If at first you don't succeed, work for Microsoft.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.3a-sha1 Charset: cp850 Comment: Registered_User_E-Secure_v1.1b1_ES000000
iQCVAwUBNMgK6Y9Co1n+aLhhAQF08wP/abLg8ftPY7nuJ1hp8OKi6Ik2lx7A70/3 0GU++TZAmLWJ4XKlgCiujm0Z06P3rSEf+qtiIOTfFKUaN4kvt9JlmkH6h8fmuAJf t48Cq5XQbeYDMJ6HjvGpPraZJd5zmqv54UQuUjswZBONNIMqt+ypy6id/hpe0BY9 mOg9VyMW1cM= =aNiz -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----